Learning through cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ perspectives in the United States

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2025.0916

Keywords:

affective domain, cognitive domain, engineering education, learning domains, psychomotor domain

Abstract

This study explores engineering students’ perceptions of their learning experiences across the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, as defined by Bloom’s Taxonomy. Despite extensive research on the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains of learning, there remains a gap in understanding how engineering students perceive their abilities within these learning frameworks, particularly in relation to teaching methodologies. The research aims to address the following questions: How do engineering students perceive their learning in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains? A survey instrument was developed, consisting of 18 items across the three learning domains. The survey was administered to engineering students who had experience as teaching assistants, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the instrument. Data were collected from 115 participants after cleaning. Skewness and kurtosis checks confirmed the assumption of normality, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity, along with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test, confirmed the appropriateness of factor analysis. Three distinct factors emerged from the EFA: the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, with values ranging from 0.63 to 0.73, indicating good reliability. The findings suggest that students report higher confidence in applying knowledge in new situations, receiving knowledge, and valuing their own learning outcomes. This study contributes to the field by providing a deeper understanding of how students perceive their learning across different domains, paving the way for more targeted and effective educational strategies in engineering programs.

Published

2025-08-04

How to Cite

1.
Mukherjee S, Kittur J. Learning through cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains: Understanding undergraduate engineering students’ perspectives in the United States. Engin Edu Rev. 2025;3. doi:10.54844/eer.2025.0916
Vol. 3 (2025)

Issue

Section

Research

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.