Global evolutionary trends of the discipline of engineering education and their empirical implications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2024.0820

Keywords:

engineering education research, engineering education discipline, teaching scholarship culture, academic community

Abstract

This study explores the gradual evolution and institutionalization of engineering education research (EER) as a discipline across different countries and regions through the perspective of historical institutionalism. By employing bibliometric and historical retrospective methodologies, the research provides a systematic analysis of the development and transformation of EER in the United States, Europe, and China, along with the dynamic progression of their engineering education disciplines. The findings reveal several key insights. First, the evolution of engineering education in the United States unfolds across five stages: educational standardization, the rise of scientism, re-engagement with engineering and reflective scholarship of teaching, the initiation of discipline construction, and the establishment of disciplinary norms. In Europe, this progression is marked by three phases: educational standardization, the development of the scholarship of teaching, and the exploration of discipline-building. Second, the alignment between China's higher engineering education and modern industrial development demonstrates a comprehensive and dynamic adaptation. The advancement of China's engineering education discipline has gone through four distinct phases: educational reform exploration, the standardization of academic community building, the formation of teaching scholarship organizations, and the initiation of discipline construction. Third, the characteristics of discipline development differ across regions. The United States's approach emphasizes practicality, professionalization, and disciplinization; in Europe, the focus lies on professionalization, networking, and practical integration; and China's model emphasizes professionalization, institutionalization, and disciplinization. Finally, the study identifies five key dimensions for guiding future reforms in the development of China's engineering education discipline, offering pathways to enhance its growth and impact.

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

1.
Zhang W, Wang S, Sun J, Wang C. Global evolutionary trends of the discipline of engineering education and their empirical implications. Engin Edu Rev. 2025;2(4):145-160. doi:10.54844/eer.2024.0820
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024)

Issue

Section

Review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.