The popularization of innovative education: Social background, theoretical basis, and action strategies

Banghong Shi

doi:10.54844/eer.2025.1001

Authors

Banghong Shi Beijing Huizhong Education Research Institute https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0678-9969

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2025.1001

Keywords:

education, innovative education, creative laborers

Abstract

Within an information or intelligent society, the individualized-needs-oriented social production objectively requires creative labor to replace standardized labor. Basic education bears the significant foundational responsibility of cultivating creative laborers. The theory of cognitive diversity serves as the intrinsic basis for the popularization of innovative education. Tools such as the "Seven Levels of Change" theory, the Creative Problem-Solving (CPS) model, and the educator-learner behavior checklists for innovative classrooms provide foundational support for this popularization. Key strategies for action include identifying the main characteristics of creative laborers, emphasizing the development of students' meta-cognitive abilities, and enhancing the leadership of schools and teachers in innovative education.

References

Gu, B. (2023). Division and integration of theory and practice. Engineering Education Review, 1(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0468

Huang, Z. Y., Nash, W., & Ke, J. (2006). Fostering creativity ability or skills? A meta-analytic perspective. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Creativity Studies (pp. 337–345). Beijing Technology Association & China Creativity Association; College of Science, Texas A&M University.

Jablokow, K. (2001). The Thinking Expedition: A Course in Creativity, Innovation and Change. In Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--9902

Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 622–629. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021–9010.61.5.622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.61.5.622

Kretschmann, J. (2024). Innovative engineering education for a better future. Engineering Education Review, 2(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2024.0564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2024.0564

Lin, C. D. (2000). [Creative talents, creative education and creative learning]. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (1), 5–8.

Lin, C. D., & Hu, W. P. (2012). [Growth rules and cultivation models of creative talents]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (1), 36–42.

Luo, M., Zhao, Z., & Zhang, X. (2025). Reform and practice of the training system for top innovative talents in aerospace mechanics based on creativity and leadership. Engineering Education Review, 3. https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2025.0853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2025.0853

Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., & Palmer, B. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: theoretical foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3/4), 221–238.

Qin, Z., & Ding, M. (2024). Reflections on educational reform supporting build China into a world leader in science and technology. Engineering Education Review, 2(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54844/eer.2023.0503

Ruttenberg, A. & Maital, S. (2014). [The Imagination Elevator: Zoom in / Zoom out / Zoom in for More Creativity, Fun and Success]. (Si, Z. & Zhang, Z. Trans.). China Machine Press.

Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1604_1

Shi, B. H., & Han, W. H. (2008). [Innovative talent strategies for private universities]. China Higher Education, (19), 42–43, 49.

Shi, B. H., Li, Y., & Ma, S. H. (2018). [Professional Competences]. Gold Wall Press.

Smith, R. (2008). The 7 Levels of Change. The Summit Publishing Group.

Stum, J. (2009). Kirton’s Adaption-innovation Theory: Managing Cognitive Styles in Times of Diversity and Change. Emerging Leadership Journeys, (1).

Xia, H. H., & Zhou, H. T. (2025). [Integrated cultivation of top innovative talents: International experiences and China’s path]. China Higher Education Research, (10), 75–83.

Xu, L. E. & Tian, W. B. (2002). [Cognitive Style and Innovation]. Study Forum, (23), 66–78.

Yin, L., & McBride, C. (2015). Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychological Science, 26(4), 424–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567203

Zeng, K. J. (2025). [Core objectives, key elements, and implementation strategies of creativity cultivation]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Education, 46(17), 128–129.